Galaxy Resources

Sustainability Report and Carbon Intensity Rankings

Is Galaxy Resources doing their part?

Their DitchCarbon score is 15

Galaxy Resources has a DitchCarbon Score of 15 out of 100, indicating a low performance in sustainability measures. This score suggests a high carbon intensity in the company’s operations. The company needs significant improvement to reduce its carbon footprint and enhance its sustainability efforts.

This was calculated based on 30+ company specific emissions data points, the higher the score, the better. Check out our methodology.

Industry emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

Galaxy Resources is a company in the metals and mining industry, which has a carbon intensity ranking of medium. Some industries are more damaging than others, this ranking gives you an indication of how carbon intensive the industry is which this company operates in.

Location emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

Galaxy Resources operates in Australia, a region with a very high carbon intensity rating. This suggests that the company’s sustainability efforts may be challenged by the high carbon footprint associated with the local energy grid and industrial practices.
14.02%

...this company is doing 14.02% worse in emissions than the industry average.

Galaxy Resources AU, situated in the heart of the metals and mining industry, was established to tap into the rich natural resources sector. Since its inception, the company has been dedicated to the exploration, development, and processing of mineral assets. With a focus on sustainability and innovation, Galaxy Resources AU offers a range of services from resource extraction to commodity production.

emission intelligence's platform recommendations for Galaxy Resources

Galaxy Resources should consider exploring opportunities for fuel switching in transportation and operations to potentially reduce their emissions by 15%.

Bad news, Galaxy Resources hasn't committed to SBTi goals yet

Galaxy Resources has not yet established specific commitments with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This means the company is still in the process of defining its goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in line with climate science.
Not participating

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

Claim this profile

Are you associate with this company?
Help us improve our data and claim this profile.

Our methodology

Read about our emission calculation methodologies, and what the DitchCarbon Score means.

Looking for a specific company?

Search our company directory or contact us for custom data requests.