Monolithic Power Systems

Sustainability Report and Carbon Intensity Rankings

Is Monolithic Power Systems doing their part?

Their DitchCarbon score is 25

Monolithic Power Systems has a DitchCarbon Score of 25 out of 100, indicating a lower performance in sustainability efforts. This score suggests a higher carbon intensity in the company’s operations and practices. To improve its ranking, Monolithic Power Systems needs to implement more effective measures to reduce its carbon footprint and enhance its environmental sustainability.

This was calculated based on 30+ company specific emissions data points, the higher the score, the better. Check out our methodology.

Industry emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

Monolithic Power Systems is a company in the industrial manufacturing sector, which has a carbon intensity ranking of low. Some industries are more damaging than others, this ranking gives you an indication of how carbon intensive the industry is which this company operates in.

Location emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

Monolithic Power Systems, located in the United States, benefits from the country’s low carbon intensity rating. This favorable environmental condition supports the company’s sustainability efforts by reducing its carbon footprint.
16.29%

...this company is doing 16.29% worse in emissions than the industry average.

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., founded in 1997 by Michael R. Hsing and James C. Moyer, is situated in San Jose, California, and operates within the industrial manufacturing sector. The company specializes in creating small, energy-efficient power solutions for a variety of industries, including industrial applications, telecom, cloud computing, automotive, and consumer electronics. With a commitment to sustainability, Monolithic Power Systems aims to reduce energy consumption through its innovative and compact product offerings.

Bad news, Monolithic Power Systems hasn't committed to SBTi yet

Monolithic Power Systems has not yet established specific commitments with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This means the company is either in the process of setting or has not publicly disclosed its goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in line with climate science.
Not participating

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

Claim this profile

Are you associate with this company?
Help us improve our data and claim this profile.

Our methodology

Read about our emission calculation methodologies, and what the DitchCarbon Score means.

Looking for a specific company?

Search our company directory or contact us for custom data requests.