World Wildlife Fund

Sustainability Report and Carbon Intensity Rankings

Is World Wildlife Fund doing their part?

Their DitchCarbon score is 30

The World Wildlife Fund has a DitchCarbon Score of 30 out of 100, indicating a lower performance in sustainability measures. This score suggests that the organization has a relatively high carbon intensity compared to other entities. To improve its standing, the World Wildlife Fund would need to implement more effective strategies to reduce its carbon footprint and enhance its sustainability efforts.

This was calculated based on 30+ company specific emissions data points, the higher the score, the better. Check out our methodology.

Industry emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

The World Wildlife Fund operates in the services sector, which has a very low carbon intensity ranking. Some industries are more damaging than others, this ranking gives you an indication of how carbon intensive the industry is which this company operates in.

Location emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

The company is situated in Switzerland, a region with a very low carbon intensity rating according to the World Wildlife Fund. This favorable environmental context supports the company’s sustainability efforts by providing a cleaner energy grid and lower baseline carbon footprint.
13.85%

...this company is doing 13.85% worse in emissions than the industry average.

Founded over 50 years ago, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) is a leading conservation organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. Operating in the services sector, WWF addresses global conservation challenges by combining scientific foundations with worldwide reach and partnerships. The organization offers innovative solutions to protect nature while considering human needs, working in 100 countries and supported by millions of members globally.

Bad news, World Wildlife Fund hasn't set SBTi commitments yet

The World Wildlife Fund has not yet established specific commitments through the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This means they have not formally defined or announced targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in line with climate science.
Not participating

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

Claim this profile

Are you associate with this company?
Help us improve our data and claim this profile.

Our methodology

Read about our emission calculation methodologies, and what the DitchCarbon Score means.

Looking for a specific company?

Search our company directory or contact us for custom data requests.