Banyan Tree Hotels and Resorts

Sustainability Report and Carbon Intensity Rankings

Is Banyan Tree Hotels and Resorts doing their part?

Their DitchCarbon score is 35

Banyan Tree Hotels and Resorts has a DitchCarbon Score of 35 out of 100, indicating a moderate level of sustainability practices. This score suggests that the company has significant room for improvement in reducing its carbon intensity. A higher score would reflect better performance in minimizing emissions and enhancing sustainability efforts.

This was calculated based on 30+ company specific emissions data points, the higher the score, the better. Check out our methodology.

Industry emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

Banyan Tree Hotels and Resorts is a company in the health and social services industry, which has a carbon intensity ranking of low. Some industries are more damaging than others, this ranking gives you an indication of how carbon intensive the industry is which this company operates in.

Location emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

Banyan Tree Hotels and Resorts is situated in a region of Western Australia that boasts a very low carbon intensity rating, indicating a cleaner energy usage profile. This favorable environmental condition enhances the sustainability efforts of the company by aligning with regions that prioritize low carbon emissions.
6.56%

...this company is doing 6.56% worse in emissions than the industry average.

Banyan Tree Holdings Limited, founded in 1994 and headquartered in Singapore, is a renowned international hospitality brand. The company specializes in premium resorts, hotels, residences, and spas, with a portfolio that includes the Banyan Tree, Angsana, Cassia, and Dhawa brands. Banyan Tree is celebrated for its integrated resorts in Asia, particularly Laguna Phuket in Thailand, and is committed to environmental sustainability and corporate social responsibility.

Bad news, Banyan Tree yet to commit to SBTi targets

Banyan Tree Hotels and Resorts has not yet established specific commitments with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This means the company is still in the process of defining clear, science-based emissions reduction targets to align with global efforts to limit warming.
Not participating

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

Claim this profile

Are you associate with this company?
Help us improve our data and claim this profile.

Our methodology

Read about our emission calculation methodologies, and what the DitchCarbon Score means.

Looking for a specific company?

Search our company directory or contact us for custom data requests.