Collins Foods

Sustainability Report and Carbon Intensity Rankings

Is Collins Foods doing their part?

Their DitchCarbon score is 44

Collins Foods has a DitchCarbon Score of 44 out of 100, indicating moderate performance in sustainability measures. This score reflects the company’s current carbon intensity level, suggesting there is significant room for improvement in reducing emissions. A higher score would denote stronger efforts to lower carbon intensity and enhance overall sustainability.

This was calculated based on 30+ company specific emissions data points, the higher the score, the better. Check out our methodology.

Industry emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

Collins Foods is a company in the hospitality industry, which has a carbon intensity ranking of low. Some industries are more damaging than others, this ranking gives you an indication of how carbon intensive the industry is which this company operates in.

Location emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

Collins Foods operates in Australia, a region with a very high carbon intensity rating. This suggests that the company’s sustainability efforts may be negatively impacted by the country’s overall high carbon emissions.
0.57%

...this company is doing 0.57% better in emissions than the industry average.

Collins Foods, established in 1968, is a prominent player in the hospitality industry based in Brisbane City, Australia. The company has grown to become a leading restaurant operator, offering a variety of dining experiences. Their services include operating well-known fast-food franchises as well as their own unique restaurant concepts.

emission intelligence's platform recommendations for Collins Foods

Collins Foods should set clear and achievable reduction targets for all purchased energy types to potentially lower their emissions by 30%.

Bad news, Collins Foods hasn't committed to SBTi goals yet

Collins Foods has not yet established specific commitments with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This means the company is yet to define and announce clear, science-based targets for reducing its greenhouse gas emissions in line with global efforts to limit warming.
Not participating

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

Claim this profile

Are you associate with this company?
Help us improve our data and claim this profile.

Our methodology

Read about our emission calculation methodologies, and what the DitchCarbon Score means.

Looking for a specific company?

Search our company directory or contact us for custom data requests.