Elders

Sustainability Report and Carbon Intensity Rankings

Is Elders doing their part?

Their DitchCarbon score is 18

Elders has a DitchCarbon Score of 18 out of 100, indicating a low performance in sustainability measures. This suggests that the company has a high carbon intensity relative to its industry peers. There is significant room for improvement in reducing emissions and enhancing its sustainability practices.

This was calculated based on 30+ company specific emissions data points, the higher the score, the better. Check out our methodology.

Industry emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

Elders operates within the food industry, which has a medium carbon intensity ranking. Some industries are more damaging than others, this ranking gives you an indication of how carbon intensive the industry is which this company operates in.

Location emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

The company Elders is located in Australia, which has a very high carbon intensity rating. This suggests that the sustainability efforts of Elders may be negatively impacted by the country’s overall high carbon emissions.
17.21%

...this company is doing 17.21% worse in emissions than the industry average.

Elders, founded in 1839 and headquartered in Adelaide, operates within the food industry, primarily focusing on agribusiness. As an iconic brand in rural and regional Australia, the company has a long-standing history of supporting the farming business. They offer tailored support to Australian farmers to enhance productivity and profitability, and they seek passionate individuals to join their team and contribute to the agricultural sector’s growth.

emission intelligence's platform recommendations for Elders

Elders could reduce their scope 1 emissions by approximately 15% by adopting fuel-efficient driving practices and implementing corresponding training programs for their personnel.

Bad news, Elders hasn't committed to SBTi targets yet

The company Elders has not yet established specific commitments with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This means they have not defined clear, science-based emissions reduction targets to align with the global effort to limit warming.
Not participating

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

Claim this profile

Are you associate with this company?
Help us improve our data and claim this profile.

Our methodology

Read about our emission calculation methodologies, and what the DitchCarbon Score means.

Looking for a specific company?

Search our company directory or contact us for custom data requests.