JK Capital Management

Sustainability Report and Carbon Intensity Rankings

Is JK Capital Management doing their part?

Their DitchCarbon score is 30

JK Capital Management has a DitchCarbon Score of 30 out of 100, indicating a lower performance in sustainability efforts. This score suggests a higher carbon intensity in their operations or investments. The company may need to implement more robust measures to reduce its carbon footprint and improve its sustainability profile.

This was calculated based on 30+ company specific emissions data points, the higher the score, the better. Check out our methodology.

Industry emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

JK Capital Management is part of the finance sector, which has a very low carbon intensity ranking compared to other industries. Some industries are more damaging than others, this ranking gives you an indication of how carbon intensive the industry is which this company operates in.

Location emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Unknown

High

Very high

JK Capital Management is located in a region within Washington, which has an unknown carbon intensity rating. Without this information, it’s challenging to assess the direct impact of the region’s energy mix on the sustainability efforts of the company.
20.83%

...this company is doing 20.83% worse in emissions than the industry average.

JK Capital Management, founded in 1994 and based in Hong Kong, operates within the finance sector, specializing in fund management. The company is a joint venture between Fabrice Jacob and La Française Group, offering a range of investment products with a focus on Asian equity and bond markets. With over two decades of experience, JK Capital Management provides services including long-only products, UCITS V SICAVs for European investors, and managed accounts for international clients.

Bad news, JK Capital Management hasn't committed to SBTi yet

JK Capital Management has not yet established specific commitments with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This means the company has not defined or announced clear goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in line with climate science.
Not participating

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​

1. Reputation and Brand Image

2. Corporate Social Responsibility

3. Becoming a Customer of Choice

4. Stakeholder Engagement

5. Risk Management

Case study — How Compleat's clients use our carbon data

Making Compleat’s customers climate heroes. Download the 19-page case study PDF.

Claim this profile

Are you associate with this company?
Help us improve our data and claim this profile.

Our methodology

Read about our emission calculation methodologies, and what the DitchCarbon Score means.

Looking for a specific company?

Search our company directory or contact us for custom data requests.