K

Kingbostrike

Sustainability Report and Carbon Intensity Rankings

Is Kingbostrike doing their part?

Their DitchCarbon score is 30

Kingbostrike has a DitchCarbon Score of 30 out of 100, indicating a lower level of sustainability in its operations. This score suggests that the company’s carbon intensity is relatively high, meaning it has significant room for improvement in reducing emissions. To enhance its sustainability efforts, Kingbostrike needs to implement more effective strategies to decrease its carbon footprint.

This was calculated based on 30+ company specific emissions data points, the higher the score, the better. Check out our methodology.

Industry emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

Kingbostrike is a company in the energy generation and distribution industry, which has a carbon intensity ranking of low. Some industries are more damaging than others, this ranking gives you an indication of how carbon intensive the industry is which this company operates in.

Location emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Unknown

High

Very high

Kingbostrike, located in Western Australia, operates in a region with a specific carbon intensity rating. The sustainability of the company’s operations is influenced by the local energy mix and environmental policies of Australia.
0.44%

...this company is doing 0.44% worse in emissions than the industry average.

Kingbostrike WA, founded in 2013, is a key player in the energy generation and distribution industry. Based in Singapore, the company specializes in providing innovative and efficient energy solutions. Through its online platform, Kingbostrike.com, it offers a range of services aimed at meeting the diverse energy needs of its clientele.

emission intelligence's platform recommendations for Kingbostrike

Kingbostrike should explore opportunities for fuel switching in transportation and operations to potentially reduce their emissions by 15%.

Bad news, Kingbostrike hasn't committed to SBTi goals yet

Kingbostrike has not yet established specific commitments with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This means the company has not publicly outlined or committed to concrete goals for reducing its greenhouse gas emissions in line with climate science.
Not participating

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

Claim this profile

Are you associate with this company?
Help us improve our data and claim this profile.

Our methodology

Read about our emission calculation methodologies, and what the DitchCarbon Score means.

Looking for a specific company?

Search our company directory or contact us for custom data requests.