OZ Minerals

Sustainability Report and Carbon Intensity Rankings

Is OZ Minerals doing their part?

Their DitchCarbon score is 15

OZ Minerals has a DitchCarbon Score of 15 out of 100, indicating a low level of sustainability in their operations. This score suggests a high carbon intensity compared to more sustainable companies. The company may need to implement significant changes to reduce its emissions and improve its sustainability profile.

This was calculated based on 30+ company specific emissions data points, the higher the score, the better. Check out our methodology.

Industry emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

OZ Minerals is a company in the metals and mining industry, which has a carbon intensity ranking of medium. Some industries are more damaging than others, this ranking gives you an indication of how carbon intensive the industry is which this company operates in.

Location emissions intensity

Very low

Low

Medium

High

Very high

OZ Minerals is situated in Australia, a region with a very high carbon intensity rating. This suggests that the company’s operations may face challenges in achieving sustainability due to the country’s significant carbon footprint.
14.02%

...this company is doing 14.02% worse in emissions than the industry average.

OZ Minerals, founded in 2008 and headquartered in Adelaide, operates within the metals and mining industry in Australia. As a copper-focused company, it manages the Prominent Hill mine and is developing the Carrapateena project, among other exploration ventures. With a commitment to safety and innovation, OZ Minerals is recognized as Australia’s third-largest copper producer, poised for global expansion.

emission intelligence's platform recommendations for OZ Minerals

OZ Minerals should set clear and achievable reduction targets for all purchased energy types, including electricity, heat, steam, and cooling, to effectively lower their Scope 2 emissions.

Bad news, OZ Minerals hasn't committed to SBTi goals yet.

OZ Minerals has not yet established specific commitments with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This means the company is still in the process of defining clear, science-based emissions reduction targets aligned with climate science.
Not participating

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

The Ultimate Guide to Building Sustainability Into Procurement​​

In this guide you can learn about the three stages of sustainable procurement.

Stage 1) – Identify and Communicate
Sustainability Maturity

Stage 2) – Start to Give Preference to Mature Suppliers

Stage 3) – Make Climate Action a “Hard” Measure for Procurement

Claim this profile

Are you associate with this company?
Help us improve our data and claim this profile.

Our methodology

Read about our emission calculation methodologies, and what the DitchCarbon Score means.

Looking for a specific company?

Search our company directory or contact us for custom data requests.