Forecast reliability notice
DitchCarbon warns on the forecast itself when an organisation's underlying disclosure is inconsistent or incomplete, and links to the disclosure so the reader can judge it.
Not always, and DitchCarbon says so on the chart. Where an organisation's Scope 3 reporting has missing years, large swings or patterns that do not hold together, a notice appears above the forecast telling you to treat it with caution, with a link to the disclosure it was built from.

A projection drawn from four inconsistent data points looks exactly like one drawn from fifteen good ones. That is the problem with forecasting on disclosed data, and the honest response is to say which you are looking at.
The notice is attached to the forecast rather than buried in a methodology page, because that is where the decision gets made. It names the reason: missing years, large variations, or patterns that suggest a reporting change rather than a real movement.
The link goes to the organisation's latest disclosure, so a reviewer can form their own view rather than accepting or discarding the forecast wholesale.
Coverage gaps are shown, not hidden. A forecast that quietly smoothed over a three year reporting hole would be more comfortable and less useful.
Common questions
No. The calculator is verified to ISO 14064-3, limited assurance, by UL Solutions, renewed annually, and that covers calculation rather than projection. A forecast carries the organisation's own reported history forward, and the reliability notice flags when that history is weak.
A notice appears on the forecast itself saying so, naming the reason: missing years, large variations, or patterns suggesting a reporting change rather than a real movement. It links to the organisation's latest disclosure so you can judge it yourself.
See it on your own suppliers or portfolio companies
Numbers you can defend within 2 weeks.
